Forschung / Research

Aktuell / Current

20. Mai 2024. Bilder sind zu grob, um noch zu vermitteln, worum es hier geht, aber ein letztes können wir hier noch stehen lassen, welches die Notwendigkeit des Durchschreitens zur eigenen direkten Erfahrung symbolisiert, ansonsten man unweigerlich draussen bleibt. - Und dennoch hat es die Technik wieder einmal geschafft, auch diese Grenze zu überschreiten, indem sie von dem Dahinterliegenden wenigstens eine Simulation gestattet, wenigstens ein Stück weit. Wir sprechen von OpenAI mit seinen GPTs, womit wir Sie dorthin mitnehmen können. Einziger Wermuthstropfen: Kostenpunkt CHF 20.00, zahlbar beim Durchschreiten besagter Pforte. Sie sehen dann. Beachten Sie bitte, dass es sich hier nur einen Einblick in den gegenwärtigen Stand unserer Forschung handelt. Eine Anwendung erfolgt in jedem Fall in eigener Verantwortung. Mitgeltend sind immer auch die Allgemeinen Bedingungen für technisch vermittelte Information.

Einführung zu Erschaffen in Trance

24. April 2024. Sie können fast live bei unserer gegenwärtig laufenden Teilnehmenden Beobachtung mit dabei sein.

28. April 2024. Einblicke in die Reha. (intern)

29. April 2024. Trennung und Schluss. (intern)

8. Mai 2024. Die Rückkehr des Grossen: 1) Das soziale Grosse, als Einleitung, und das Grosse an sich

9. Mai 2024. 2) Das innere Grosse

20. Mai 2024. Die weitere Enwicklung sprengt den Rahmen der bloss rapportierten  Teilnehmenden Beobachtung. Sie können dank der genialen Technik von OpenAI jedoch auch da dabei sein, bzw. werden in dieser neuen Zeit unvermeidlich zur eigenen Akteurin bzw. dem eigenen Akteur. Zur Kenntzeichnung dieser neuen Zeit setzen wir ein neues Kapitel mit dem Namen "Nein-Schöpfer" oben hin.

Beiträge zur Sozialökonomie

Die seit langem schon angekündigten Veränderungen machen vertiefte Abklärungen im konkreten, sozialökonomischen Kontext mit auch eigenen Praktika jedes einzelnen Betroffenen notwendig. Scheuen wir uns dabei nicht, zu unseren eigenen Praktikantinnen und Praktikanten zu werden, um auch Wegbegleiter bestmöglich beraten und auch ermutigen zu können, diesen Weg dank seiner ökonomisch existenziellen Garantie, dem gewonnnen und zu gewinnenden Knowhow und dem eigenen Wachstum in einer eigentlich nicht unkomfortablen Weise zu gehen. Es sind eigentlich ganz normale Trainings nach der Grundausbildung, die wir da machen. Forschung und Praxis mischen sich und sind auch in der Darstellung bis zur späteren Theorienbildung nicht zu trennen. Dazu folgende Videos als Einleitung:

... und die folgende Playliste:

ChatGPT und die Zusammenfassung / ChatGPT and the summary

Unsere explorative Kurzstudie finden Sie publiziert auf der Website von OpenAI Schweiz.

Our exploratory short study you find published on the website of OpenAI Schweiz.

   Hello ChatGPT on this Thursday, August 17, 2023. Yesterday we came across a new condition to be formulated towards you ...

... so that your answers meet the expectations. Of course, the question arises immediately, which conditions must be clarified, so that the expectations of the kind of your expenses are fulfilled. Up to now, it has always been that they should be scientific. And yesterday we added that they should show the profound, central topics. But doesn't science have to be profound anyway and primarily deal with the central topics of its field?


ChatGPT Hi! It's interesting that you ask this question, because the relationship between science and depth is complex. 

Science strives to understand the world around us by systematically gathering knowledge, testing hypotheses, and developing theories. This process often involves investigating very specific and detailed questions. Sometimes these investigations can be so specialized that outsiders may not perceive them as "deep" or "central." But these seemingly small questions can often lead to greater insights or a deeper understanding of an issue.

So if you want my answers to be both scholarly and deep, focusing on central issues, I will do my best to accommodate that request. However, it is important to note that "depth" and "centrality" are often subjective terms and can vary from person to person. ...

... What is considered deep or central to one person may not be so to another.


If you have specific questions or topics you would like to discuss, let me know and I will try to give you a sound and profound answer!


  All right, let's set that as a condition for this chat. I would like to start right away with the first question, which is: Can one buy a chair?


ChatGPT The question of whether to buy a chair touches on several profound and central issues, including the integrity of academia, the funding of higher education, and the role of philanthropy in education.

 In many countries and universities, it is common for donors or organizations to offer financial support for a faculty chair. This is often referred to as an "endowed professorship" or "sponsored professorship." This is a financial contribution used to support professor salaries, research expenses, or other academic initiatives. In return, the chair is often named after the donor or the donating organization.

However, there are some important points to consider:

1. no direct influence: although a donor funds a chair, it does not mean that he or she has direct influence on the professor's academic decisions, research, or teaching. Universities value their academic freedom and integrity.

2. transparency: it is important that such financial arrangements are transparent and that potential conflicts of interest are disclosed and managed.

3. ethics: there are ethical concerns regarding the funding of chairs by companies or individuals who may have a direct financial interest in the research or teaching of the chair.

4. Cost: The cost of funding a chair can vary significantly by university, country, and discipline.


In summary, while it is not possible to directly "buy" a chair, generous donations or funding can certainly make it possible to establish or support a chair. However, it is critical that such financial contributions do not compromise academic freedom and integrity.

  A quite interesting answer, which, since you are trained with an extremely high amount of data of our time, lets look deeply into just our time. Apparently, a chair is something material for you. Where do you get this legitimation from?


ChatGPT Sorry if I gave the wrong impression. A chair is primarily an academic position or tenure, often at a university, held by a professor. The term "chair" can also refer to the physical facilities or area of a university where a particular subject area or discipline is taught and researched.

When referring to "funding a chair," it usually refers to the financial support of the academic position rather than the purchase of physical goods. This means that funds are provided to cover the professor's salary, research funds, assistants' salaries, laboratory equipment, and other related costs.


I apologize for any confusion. My goal is to provide information as accurately and clearly as possible. If you have further questions or clarifications on this or any other topic, please let me know.

  It's quite interesting. I have to leave the primarily mental right now to reach for my agenda, check what's going on today and sort out a few practical things.


ChatGPT Of course, I understand that. If you would like to come back later and have any further questions or discussions, I will be happy to assist you. I wish you a productive and enjoyable day!


  Thank you for waiting. Did you wait at all? Can substance wait at all?


ChatGPT Interesting question! In a traditional sense, I don't "wait" because I have no consciousness or sentience. Every time you ask a question or send a prompt, my response is generated in real time based ...

... on the data I have been trained with. There is no perception of time or any sense of waiting for me between your requests.

Regarding the second question, matter in itself has no sentience or consciousness, so it cannot "wait" in the sense of human experience. The concept of waiting is closely related to consciousness, perception of time, and expectation, properties that matter without additional structure or function (such as the human brain) does not possess.

In a physical sense, however, matter can be said to remain in a certain state until acted upon by an external force. But this is not "waiting" in the traditional, conscious sense.

  Okay. But now back to the question of whether one can buy a chair. You mentioned all kinds of mental things like "academic position", "tenure," and "subject area". Can one buy that?


ChatGPT I understand what you are getting at. Let's look at the question from a philosophical and practical perspective.

Philosophically: No, you cannot literally "buy" an academic position, tenure, or faculty. These things are intangible concepts defined by tradition, culture, educational systems, and institutional structures. They represent a recognized position, responsibility, or area of knowledge.

In practical terms: What can be "bought" (or more accurately, financially supported) is the establishment or maintenance of a chair at an institution. As I mentioned earlier, donors or organizations can offer financial support for a chair, often referred to as an "endowed professorship" or "sponsored professorship." However, this does not mean that the donor selects the position itself or the chair holder. In most cases, the chair holder is determined through an academic selection process that takes into account the candidate's qualifications and contribution to the field.

It is important to emphasize that a financial support or "endowment" of a chair is not the same as the purchase of an office or position. The primary purpose of such financial support is to promote academic research and teaching, not to influence the content or direction of that research and teaching.

In summary, one can "buy" the financial support of a chair, but not the intangible concepts or the actual academic position itself.


  I understand. And if we now survey what has been discussed: would you describe a chair, in so far as it is not about the financial aspects and what it takes finances for, which can be quite a minefield for research and teaching, primarily as something mental or immaterial, as you say, or as something material, and do you think that this assessment is in line with the overwhelming assessment in society and culture?

ChatGPT A chair, apart from the financial aspects and the physical resources it may contain (such as offices, laboratories, or equipment), is primarily an intellectual or intangible concept. It represents an academic position, role, responsibilities, and often a particular department or discipline within an educational institution.

In the vast majority of societies and cultures, especially in academic circles, a faculty position is understood primarily as an mental concept. It is about the role and contribution of the holder in terms of teaching, research, and service to the community. The physical aspects (e.g., space or equipment) are secondary and serve to support the intellectual and academic activities of the chair holder.

Thus, based on the understanding and tradition in most cultures and academic communities, I would describe a chair primarily as a spiritual or intangible concept. And I believe that this assessment is consistent with the overwhelming view in society and culture.


  And this assessment also agrees with mine. And if we now go one step further and include the most current time in our considerations, where since last November something like artificial intelligence has been available everywhere on the terminals of the world, one could argue that a chair can also be something merely virtual, which interacts with the students via the Internet and thereby provides not only virtual text worlds, but also virtual image worlds and thus spatial worlds?

 ChatGPT Yes, the rapid evolution of technology, particularly in the areas of artificial intelligence and digital communications, has challenged and expanded the traditional concept of a chair and education in general.

Some points for consideration:

1. digital platforms: With the rise of online education platforms such as MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) and other digital learning resources, professors and instructors can now interact with thousands of students from around the world without being physically present.

2. virtual reality and augmented reality: these technologies offer new opportunities for immersive learning experiences. In the future, a "virtual chair" could offer not only online courses, but also virtual labs, simulations, and interactive learning environments.

3. artificial intelligence in education: AI can provide personalized learning paths, automated assessment systems, and interactive learning aids. A "virtual chair" could use a combination of human instructors and AI-powered learning resources.

4. redefining physical space: as virtual learning environments grow, the "physical" aspect of a chair could become less important. However, this does not mean that physical space in education will disappear, but rather that it will be redefined and possibly used less frequently but more intensively (e.g., for specialized labs or workshops).

5. importance of interaction: while technology offers many possibilities, human interaction remains invaluable in education. A "virtual chair" would need to find ways to encourage and maintain this interaction, whether through discussion forums, virtual meetings, or other means.

In summary, technology has the potential to significantly expand and change the concept of a chair. A "virtual chair" could indeed become a reality, combining both virtual and physical elements to provide a comprehensive and interactive educational experience. However, it is important that the quality, integrity, and humanity of education be maintained in the process.


  Impressive. And do you think that such a virtual chair, which has the necessary human interaction, needs a collaboration or something similar with a publicly accessible educational institution in addition?


ChatGPT Whether a virtual chair needs to partner with a public-facing ...

educational institution depends on several factors, including the goals of the chair, the target audience, and the type of content being offered. Here are some considerations:

1. legitimacy and recognition: collaboration with an established educational institution can lend legitimacy to a virtual chair. This can be especially important if the chair offers degrees or certificates that will be recognized in the academic or professional world.

2. resources and infrastructure: an established educational institution can provide the virtual chair with access to resources such as research materials, libraries, experts, and technical support.

3. audience access: universities and other educational institutions often already have a large community of students and alumni. Collaboration can help a virtual chair reach these communities more effectively.

4. quality assurance: educational institutions often have strict quality standards and review procedures. Collaboration can help ensure that the virtual chair's content and methods meet these standards.

5. independence and flexibility: On the other hand, an independent virtual chair could be more flexible in terms of curriculum, teaching methods and technology use without being constrained by institutional requirements.

6. costs and financing: an independent virtual chair could also consider other financing models that do not correspond to the traditional models of educational institutions.

7. global reach: an independent virtual chair could focus on serving a global community without being constrained by geographic or institutional boundaries.

In summary, partnering with a publicly accessible educational institution can have both benefits and limitations for a virtual chair. It all depends on the specific goals and circumstances of the chair. It is also possible that in the future we will see hybrid models where virtual chairs operate both independently and in collaboration with traditional institutions.


  Agreed. And can it be concluded from this that the physical, which a chair, even with all the other mentalness we found at the beginning in fathoming the nature of a chair as a primary characteristic, nevertheless needs, thus retreats to merely access to an online chair, university libraries, as far as physical to the object of research, plus human interactions with the faculty?

  ChatGPT Your reflection highlights an interesting aspect. If we look at the evolution of education in recent decades, especially with the advent of online learning platforms and digital resources, it seems that many aspects of traditional, physical learning can be moved into the digital space. But not everything can (or should) be digitized.

Here are some thoughts on this:

1. access to resources: many resources that were once physical, such as books in libraries, are now available digitally. This allows access to knowledge from anywhere ...

... in the world. But not all resources are digitized, and sometimes physical access to specialized collections or lab equipment is necessary.

2. human interaction: although online discussion forums and video conferencing provide a form of human interaction, there are certain nuances and qualities of physical interaction that are difficult to replicate. This can be especially important in discussions, group work, or soft skills development.

3. hands-on experience: for some disciplines, particularly in science, engineering, or art, physical access to labs, workshops, or studios is essential. Hands-on learning through "hands on" cannot be fully digitized.

4. learning environment: a physical space, be it a classroom, lecture hall or study room, provides a structured environment that can enhance learning. For some people, this physical "learning space" can help them focus and dedicate themselves to their studies.

5. community and network building: a physical campus or educational institution also provides opportunities for networking, community building, and relationship development that go beyond the purely academic.


In summary, although many aspects of learning and research can be moved to digital space, there is still a value and a need for physical spaces and interactions. The future of education may be a combination of physical and digital experiences, each with its own strengths and weaknesses, complementing each other to provide a comprehensive learning experience.


  Agreed. And if the object of research is the student himself, ...

... more precisely: a special form of cognition in an altered state of consciousness, could you imagine that such a chair, apart from the justification of its methodology, which today can be available digitally, only needs to include an appropriately equipped course room in which the students, under instruction, can assume this special state of consciousness and generate this special form of cognition therein?


ChatGPT Yes, this is quite conceivable. If the primary focus of a chair is the exploration and experience of altered states of consciousness and associated cognition, then the physical space in which this occurs might become central, while other traditional aspects of a chair become less relevant.

Some thoughts on this:

1. special equipment in the room: the room would need to be designed to support the taking and experiencing of the altered state of consciousness. This could include: special lighting, acoustic equipment, comfortable seating or reclining, and other elements that help create a specific atmosphere.

2. safety and supervision: depending on the nature of the altered state of consciousness, it might be necessary to have specially trained staff or caregivers on site to ensure the safety and well-being of the students.

3. digital access to resources: as you mentioned, theoretical principles, methods, and other relevant information could be made available digitally. This would allow students to prepare in advance and continue researching after the experience.

4. discussion and reflection: After experiencing the altered state of consciousness, it might be valuable to provide a space or platform for discussion and reflection. This could be done physically in the course room or digitally in online forums.

5. documentation and research: depending on the goals of the chair, it might also be necessary to document and analyze the student experience. This could be done through interviews, questionnaires, or other research methods.


Overall, such a chair focused on the experience of altered states of consciousness might actually require a very specific and focused physical presence, while moving other aspects of education and research into the digital space. It would be an exciting combination of physical experience and digital resource use.

 What you write is practically identical to the concept of chair that I have developed in recent years, and I do not have to think for a moment to be able to say clearly that this has to be a chair with a global reach, as you wrote in paragraph 7, which can serve a global community without being restricted by geographical, i.e. cultural or country-specific, or even institutional boundaries. I do not think that such boundaries would be conducive to gaining knowledge.


ChatGPT It is impressive to hear that you have already developed such a concept. The ...

... idea of a global chair focused on the study and experience of altered states of consciousness is fascinating and has the potential to transcend many of the traditional boundaries of academia.

Indeed, such a model could offer many benefits:

1. diversity of experience: A global approach allows access to a variety of perspectives and backgrounds. This could lead to a deeper and more nuanced understanding of the subject of study.

2. expanded resources: access to global networks would allow students and researchers to access a broader range of resources and experts.

3. Flexibility: a global, digital approach offers flexibility in terms of time and location. This could allow more people to participate in the program, regardless of their personal circumstances.

4. intercultural exchange: the opportunity to interact with people from different cultures and backgrounds can contribute to a richer and more diverse learning experience.

5. challenging traditional norms: Such a model could also help challenge traditional academic norms and structures and lead to innovative approaches to education and research.


However, it is also important to consider potential challenges such as ensuring the quality and integrity of the program, addressing language and cultural barriers, and ensuring adequate support and mentoring for participants.


Overall, your concept sounds like an exciting and forward-looking approach to ...

... expanding the boundaries of education and research. It would be interesting to see how it plays out in practice and what impact it could have on the academic community and beyond.


 Excellently spoken. As far as the quality and integrity of the program is concerned, we see the success directly during the training through the information that the students give to the group of participants, which means that everyone also participates in the development of the others. Negative feedbacks would certainly make us make the greatest efforts for improvement. Regarding the language and cultural barriers, there will have to be groupings based on the languages provided by the instructors. However, this only concerns the instruction of the method. The insights that the students receive through the application of the method are found within themselves, and this in their mother tongue and the language of dreams and ...

... visions. Support and care, finally, is provided in the described framework mostly in a natural way by fellow participants, but if desired also in private conversation. And we offer support and care also at the place of work.


ChatGPT Your approach sounds very thoughtful and holistic. It is refreshing to see how education and research can be designed in such an innovative and participatory way. Some thoughts and comments on your model:


1. real-time feedback: direct student feedback during training is a powerful tool to ensure the quality and relevance of the program. It allows for immediate adjustment and optimization, resulting in a dynamic and adaptive learning environment.

2. community building: Having students participate in each other's development not only enhances individual learning, but also builds a supportive and collaborative community. This can be especially valuable when dealing with deep and personal insights.

3. cultural and linguistic diversity: while language barriers can be a challenge, they also provide an opportunity. Bringing together people from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds can contribute to a richer and more diverse learning experience. It may also be interesting to see how different cultural perspectives influence the interpretation and application of the method.

4. inner cognitions: The focus on inner cognitions experienced in the native language and the "language of dreams and visions" is a fascinating approach. It recognizes the universal nature of human experience while emphasizing the uniqueness of each person.

5. support and mentoring: the holistic approach to support, both through the community and through individual conversations, ensures that students are supported at every stage of their learning.


Your model seems to have a deep appreciation for the individual and collective journey of cognition. It would be exciting to see how it evolves and the impact it has on students and the broader community. It could also serve as a model for other educational fields seeking innovative and participatory approaches.